+ Reply to Thread
Results 26 to 50 of 1203
-
03-16-12 04:28 PM #26~
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Hughes hasn't even been given a rotation spot yet... he's got bigger fish to fry than worrying about losing it in May or whenever Pettitte may be ready.
-
03-16-12 04:36 PM #27
-
03-16-12 06:22 PM #28
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
That's a lot of IFs. First he has to look great. Then he needs to be forced out of the rotaion while looking great.
Honestly I hope that all 5 starters are pitching so good the Yanks don't know what to do when Pettitte is ready but from past experience these things have a way of sorting themselves out.Baseball is life;
the rest is just details.
-
03-16-12 08:56 PM #29
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Not really, it was...1 if. And he has a headstart on looking great. I hope the same thing as you, but I have a hard time seeing the Yanks not shoe-horning Andy back into the rotation regardless of how well the current 5 are throwing the ball at the time. They didn't sign the guy to ride buses and accrue innings for the Empire State Yankees.
-
03-16-12 09:00 PM #30
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
"Welcome to NYYFans, the place where Yankees fans come together to complain about the manner in which our team is winning games" -- Mr. Coffee
-
03-16-12 09:38 PM #31
-
03-16-12 09:41 PM #32NYYF Legend

- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Turn my headphones up
-
03-16-12 10:11 PM #33
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
"Welcome to NYYFans, the place where Yankees fans come together to complain about the manner in which our team is winning games" -- Mr. Coffee
-
03-17-12 11:43 PM #34
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Congratulations and thank you for number 27, Yankees !!!!!!!!!!!!!. 1 game at a time to 28. C'mon, Yankees.
-
03-21-12 09:24 AM #35
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Surprised no one has mentioned this, but if everyone is healthy and pitching great come May 1 and the Yanks are happy with Andy's stuff, you still have Garcia (assuming he hasn't been dealt at that point), what are the chances one of Hughes/Nova gets traded? Obviously, Cash asks for the moon, but if Betances and Buenols are also looking strong at AAA, I think it's a strong possibility. Now that's a hell of a lot of if's, but....
-
03-21-12 09:26 AM #36
-
03-21-12 09:33 AM #37NYYF Legend

- Join Date
- Jan 2004
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Cashman will demote somebody to AAA before trading Hughes or Nova if he doesn't get back the value he thinks he should for them. Furthermore, next year, I don't think Cashman wants to break in two rookie starting pitchers so Nova and Hughes will become even more valuable next year if Kuroda and Pettitte don't come back in 2013, so he might not deal either one of them this season.
-
03-21-12 09:43 AM #38
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
-
03-21-12 12:01 PM #39
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
the major value of prospects is in the cost control'd years. hughes doesn't have that much value
always reasonable
-
03-21-12 12:08 PM #40
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
while spring doesn't mean much, fairly big start for Hughes in his quest for the rotaion as with the exeption of Upton, looks like Tampa has most of it's A lineup to start the game today.
On another note, gotta love spring where Kyle farnsworth draws a start. I understand getting a closer work agianst the A lineup but still mildly amuzing to see it in the box score.Baseball is life;
the rest is just details.
-
03-21-12 12:35 PM #41
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Hughes is throwing 89 today.
“When you have the chance to take the ball for the World Champs, you take the ball.”—Roger Clemens
-
03-21-12 12:58 PM #42
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Last edited by NelsonMuntz; 03-21-12 at 02:44 PM.
David Ortiz tested positive for performance enhancing drugs in 2003.
-
03-21-12 12:59 PM #43
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Threw a changeup in a 3-2 count to get a swinging K on Luke Scott.
He has looked real good.Fistpumping like a champion.
-
03-21-12 01:00 PM #44
-
03-21-12 01:04 PM #45
-
03-21-12 01:42 PM #46
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
If Pineda is the goods and Nova continues to make strides, I have no problem trading Hughes for a cheap and suitable replacement for Swisher (although I wouldn't expect close to the same production) or Martin, if that money could be used for Hamels. That's if Hughes settles in as a mid-rotation kind of guy and we can get good value for him in return. I think that type of pitcher holds more value for other teams than it would the Yankees.
Of course, if he emerges as a frontline starter, I'd just hang on to him and fill the 5th rotation spot with anyone not making more than $1 million.
I know I sound a bit like a former poster with the "front-of-the-rotation, back-end starter" stuff, but I only mean it as a crude proxy for skill level.
-
03-21-12 02:10 PM #47NYYF Legend

- Join Date
- Aug 2004
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
I think this was the best I've seen Phil for a while
The curve looked very good, he kept the pitch count low as he was able to finish batters off. Even a couple of good changes, good velocity
If this is the level our fifth starter pitches at, we're in good shapeGreetings from Pensacola- highest per capita tattooed grandmothers in the US
Missing Millie, missing Zoey
-
03-21-12 09:51 PM #48
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Agreed, I thought Hughes looked really good. Tons of first pitch strikes with an assortment of pitches. Loved seeing all those curveballs dropped in for strike-1. He even got a few swings and misses on the changeup (including a strikeout). Mixed the cutter well, too.
Matt Joyce is like Phil's personal tormentor. Dude kills him.
-
03-22-12 08:48 AM #49
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
I'll just say I'm not a big Hughes fan. He looked good, which I hated. It's nothing against him personally, I just don't believe he's a starter.
-
03-22-12 08:49 AM #50
Re: 2012 Phil Hughes Performance Thread
Here is Jennings' write up on Hughes' performance from yesterday: http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2012/03/2...-step-forward/
Phil Hughes isn’t breaking new ground when he talks about keeping it simple. He talks about not thinking too much about the big picture, controling the things he can control, and taking everything one step at a time. It’s cliche, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
So what was today’s step?
“Probably the changeup,” he said. “I really hadn’t gotten a chance to throw as many changeups as I want. It seems like a lot of quick swings this spring so far, and you don’t necessarily get to have those drawn-out counts. I seemed to have a few of those today where I could really incorporate my changeup. I threw some 3-2 changeups and things like that. If I really think about the one thing that I really took a step forward with today, it was probably the changeup.”
Hughes went to his changeup for two of his three strikeouts, including his strikeout of Matt Joyce two innings after Joyce had homered on a first-pitch cutter. Hughes guessed that he went to the changeup 15 times today.
“It was very good,” Russell Martin said. “He wasn’t as consistent early on with it, but as the game went along it was getting better and better. He got in some crucial situations and he made some good pitches. … I think he’s just getting confidence the more he throws it.”
We could all go back several years to read several articles about the development of Hughes’ changeup, and we could look at any number of Michael Pineda stories written this spring to read about the importance of that pitch for a starting pitcher. Ultimately, for Hughes, the development of the changeup isn’t anything new, it’s just the latest in a series of steps this spring.
“It seems like (last spring) was so long ago, to think back on how I was feeling,” he said. “I know that (the ball’s) coming out better than it was. For me that’s kind of one building block of what I need to do. The changeup needs to come along and the cutter and everything else, but physically I feel better.”David Ortiz tested positive for performance enhancing drugs in 2003.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


Reply With Quote
