+ Reply to Thread
Results 1,876 to 1,900 of 2768
-
04-25-12 05:07 PM #1876Forum Regular
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Pitchers are always a risky investment, and any time you pay a significant price for a young arm, you know that it could blow up on any given pitch. However, the consensus at the time of the deal is that it was a smart move for the Yankees to make, and an organization can’t entirely avoid acquiring pitchers simply due to a preference for risk avoidance. If you want a good pitching staff, you’re going to have to take some gambles on some young arms. The Yankees did, and in this case, it didn’t work. That doesn’t make it a bad idea, or a move that the Yankees front office should be criticized for making.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index...h-torn-labrum/
the bolded seems to be argued against by some in this thread. Or is it something unique to Pineda or Montero that made this a particularly bad gamble?
It seems there's a ton of variation between "labral tears" and that third parties won't be that informative because they don't have the specific information. The optimism coming from the yankees about the chances of recovery are a bit reassuring.
-
04-25-12 05:07 PM #1877
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
I think game threads are an acquired taste. I think many people (myself in this group) simply see no enjoyment in posting in the game thread very often. Sometimes it interests me, usually it seems boring to me. That is no reflection on whether I want to WATCH the game.
Win one for The Boss.
-
04-25-12 05:07 PM #1878
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Just like on the opposite side those against are calling Pineda's career over for the same reason. Obviously this is bad news but the bottom line is no one knows what the final outcome will be. Obviously anytime a shoulder injury happens it is worse than the elbow bit the fact there is no rotator cuff damage and it is being done arthroscopically is at least somewhat less negative news.
-
04-25-12 05:07 PM #1879
-
04-25-12 05:08 PM #1880
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
I didn't like Montero's attitude. He was whiny.
Pineda had the mindset of a pitcher to me. Not a thrower. He came and took a below average change up and make it look good. He seemed more about doing his job than about Michael Pineda. Montero seemed to be all about Montero.
-
04-25-12 05:08 PM #1881
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Looks like he had it in 1995 and 1999. I don't know if that is good news or bad.
http://articles.philly.com/2000-02-2...eneral-manager27 World Championships
40 AL Pennants
Liberated France Twice
-
04-25-12 05:10 PM #1882
-
04-25-12 05:11 PM #1883NYYF Cy Young

- Join Date
- Dec 2003
-
04-25-12 05:17 PM #1884
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Near as I can tell the sucess rate is somewhere between 33-66% pn should surgeries for MLBers. Not sure how relaible that is and if it is all shoulder surgries or just a subset of them as the data came from one USA Today article I found.
I believe Jake Peavy, C-M Wang and Johan Santana are three recent examples of pitchers who have returned from shoulder surgries to return to MLB rosters. Whether or not they have returned to their pre-injury level is debatable given the small samples on 2 of them and peavy didn't look great his first seasons back from the injury.Baseball is life;
the rest is just details.
-
04-25-12 05:17 PM #1885
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
-
04-25-12 05:20 PM #1886
-
04-25-12 05:20 PM #1887
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
I don't think anyone is arguing that outright. It's more a matter of acquiring a pitcher under the right circumstances. The Yankees traded from a position of scarcity for a position of relative abundance while at the same time eschewing their greatest advantage, i.e. financial might.
-
04-25-12 05:21 PM #1888
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Point completely missed by you.
His success, whenever he had it, was tied to his velocity, which in all likelihood he won't be able to sustain as a SP.
That's not bashing Pineda either. He'll have to be a different pitcher than the one we traded for if he is to succeed. Pointing that out isn't bashing."In baseball, you don't know nothin'." - Yogi Berra
-
04-25-12 05:22 PM #1889
-
04-25-12 05:22 PM #1890
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
At least we got Jose Campos to make ourselves feel better.
I'm not going to engage in the hyperbole of both sides because I value my sanity but man are some of you guys really terrible.
-
04-25-12 05:24 PM #1891
-
04-25-12 05:30 PM #1892
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Gee, good thing Andy decided to make a comeback. I'm wondering if he did'nt get a phone call.
What we can appreciate now is that the Yankees from 1996-2003 were even more extraordinary than we thought.
-
04-25-12 05:33 PM #1893
-
04-25-12 05:35 PM #1894
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Thanks zim
Lilly wouldn't count, coffee, because I'm specifically looking for hard throwers who regained their prior velocity.
All I'm trying to discern here is whether or not we can still get the pitcher we traded for, the power pitcher who sits in the mid 90's, or if those days are gone forever. Thats why I was asking for examples of power pitchers who made a full recovery from this surgery, and its encouraging to know its been done, hopefully Pineda can do it too.
-
04-25-12 05:36 PM #1895
-
04-25-12 05:37 PM #1896
-
04-25-12 05:38 PM #1897
-
04-25-12 05:40 PM #1898
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Montero was whiny? That reminds me of the "Cano smiles and laughs too much...he doesnt care!" or "ARod puckers his lips at the plate...he's scared!" nonsense.

-
04-25-12 05:40 PM #1899
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Man we have bad luck with young pitchers. Oh well, hope he comes back throwing gas in '13.

-
04-25-12 05:41 PM #1900
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
I knew yesterday, when Pineda's agent went seeking a second opinion, that we were shtupped
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


Reply With Quote

