+ Reply to Thread
Results 1,576 to 1,600 of 2768
-
04-22-12 03:36 PM #1576
-
04-22-12 03:41 PM #1577
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Was it really just a one game drop? Here is data from fangraphs: http://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfx.asp...ion=P#velocity
Looks like he was down for a few starts in the 2nd half of the season, but maybe I am misinterpreting the data. FWIW I hope I'm wrong.David Ortiz tested positive for performance enhancing drugs in 2003.
-
04-22-12 03:45 PM #1578
-
04-22-12 03:55 PM #1579
-
04-22-12 05:27 PM #1580
-
04-22-12 05:38 PM #1581
-
04-22-12 06:11 PM #1582
-
04-22-12 06:15 PM #1583
-
04-22-12 06:36 PM #1584Forum Regular
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Tiffin, Ohio
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
I agree it may take years before we can really figure who might have won out on this trade.
The thing I cannot understand it why baseball clubs are so cheap when it comes to physicals before a pending trade. It it was all scrubs that were involved I understand. Even if it cost an extra $25,000 for the exam for MRIs, CT SCANS or whatever. A pitchers throwing arm should be checked out to the highest extent possible. If a hitter was a great base runner then his legs and knees should get great scrutiny. Just does not make sense to save a few dollars when we do not give thorough medical exams before a trade is made in trades like this one.
-
04-22-12 07:06 PM #1585Forum Regular
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
He had a complete workup. The trade (like all others) was pending a physical. Meaning both teams had to bring the players in and run all sorts of tests.
No conspiracy, no negligence by the Yankees. All the assumptions claiming the Yankees just ignored his drop-off post all-star break or any type of full physical are just that, assumptions.
You really think Cash handed over his boy (Montero) to the Mariners without complete knowledge that he was healthy? Seriously, if you think that, say it out loud to yourself. I mean it. Stop what your doing and say "Cashman gave up one of his favorite prospects for over the past 5 years for a pitcher without knowing if he was healthy. He had no concerns and didn't have it checked out. The Yankees have won more games than anyone else in baseball since Cashman has been the GM and he has no clue what he is doing. The Yankees have rebuilt a farm system that has some depth and power after Cashman gained some real control but he has no clue what he is doing." Sounds pretty crazy to me......You know they are not real pies, right?
"I heard Jackie Bradley junior was already voted to the ASG....for the next three years." - NerfBall55 4/4/2013
-
04-22-12 08:27 PM #1586NYYF Legend

- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Brooklyn
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
My main question is how was Pineda out of shape to start ST when the Yankees had just given him a physical about 30-40 days prior? Did they not notice when they gave him the physical? Did he gain those lbs between the time of the physical and the start of ST? Was he 30 lbs overweight at the time of the physical and then was able to trim down to only 10-20 lbs overweight by the time ST started?
-
04-22-12 08:50 PM #1587
-
04-22-12 08:52 PM #1588
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Theboss, it's been said in this thread mumerous times. Pineda was thrown off his schedule from the trade.
-
04-22-12 08:58 PM #1589NYYF Legend

- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Brooklyn
-
04-22-12 09:05 PM #1590
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
Marc Carig tweeted it a while ago. But I really
CBF to go through 60 pages and see where it was posted.
-
04-22-12 09:21 PM #1591
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
-
04-22-12 10:21 PM #1592NYYF MVP

- Join Date
- Nov 2010
-
04-22-12 10:29 PM #1593
-
04-22-12 10:29 PM #1594NYYF Triple Crown

- Join Date
- Jan 2007
-
04-23-12 06:53 AM #1595Forum Regular
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
most of this was just lowering expectations/pressure. He's not a number 1 with his repertoire from last year, but he had a 3.5 xfip, 3.4 WAR (Montero has to mash to equal this) on an innings limit, the 7th highest k/9 among all starters, the highest swinging strike percentage, and he was in the all-star game. He has more upside, but I don't understand where this notion that he is unproven came from.
We have the guy for the next 5 years and as long as he doesn't need surgery, I'm pretty happy with what I've seen so far. That dominant pitcher from last year developed a useable change up in a few weeks of spring training. The shoulder and the velocity are concerns, but as long as the news today isn't bad, there's room for optimism.
-
04-23-12 07:13 AM #1596NYYF MVP

- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Connecticut
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
If he tore something in his should you can chalk this up for a major win for Seattle!
-
04-23-12 07:25 AM #1597
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
That's quite a leap in logic you made there. I think he's referring to this:
http://riveraveblues.com/2012/04/mic...-timing-66571/A wrinkle in the Michael Pineda Saga: Turns out that Pineda was slated to arrive at M’s camp Jan. 22 to work out early, just as he did before his great rookie year. Then Pineda got traded, and there was a 10-day lag before it became official. Ultimately, Pineda didn’t arrive in Tampa until Feb. 14, still early, but not as planned. Impossible to know if extra 3 weeks of work would have made difference. But Pineda knows this much: “Next year, I’m coming early. I’m doing my plan.”27 World Championships
40 AL Pennants
Liberated France Twice
-
04-23-12 08:38 AM #1598
-
04-23-12 09:07 AM #1599NYYF Triple Crown

- Join Date
- Oct 2006
Re: 2012 Michael Pineda Performance Thread
-
04-23-12 09:18 AM #1600
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



Reply With Quote
