If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

**RhodyYanksFan** · 11-01-08 08:21 AM

You vs. 5 people with no arms or 5 people with no legs?

Discuss.

**Trish** · 11-01-08 08:24 AM

Is there something wrong with you?

**Tabata** · 11-01-08 08:32 AM

This isn’t even close. Getting kicked hurts a lot more than getting punched. Plus if they don’t have any legs they can’t run after you.

**CptCrunch** · 11-01-08 08:35 AM

I'll take the legless. They've got far less mobility.

**4bronxbombers** · 11-01-08 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by Trish

Is there something wrong with you?

**RhodyYanksFan** · 11-01-08 08:41 AM

Originally Posted by Trish

Is there something wrong with you?

Sorry, I felt like taking the reigns from xeno today.

**krystl** · 11-01-08 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by RhodyYanksFan

Sorry, I felt like taking the reigns from xeno today.

And it's only the beginning of the off season.

**RhodyYanksFan** · 11-01-08 09:05 AM

Originally Posted by krystl

And it's only the beginning of the off season.

Oh please, it's been the offseason since August 20th.

**Big_E** · 11-01-08 09:11 AM

No arms. It's hard for people to balance without arms. One good hit and they'd fall over.

**RhodyYanksFan** · 11-01-08 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by Big_E

No arms. It's hard for people to balance without arms. One good hit and they'd fall over.

That's what I originally thought, but then I remembered My Left Foot. Those people can do anything with their legs. It's really a tough call to make.

**In Mo I Trust** · 11-01-08 09:14 AM

Legless, no mobility.

**krystl** · 11-01-08 09:17 AM

I thought of this immediately:

**fredgmuggs** · 11-01-08 09:21 AM

Originally Posted by In Mo I Trust

Legless, no mobility.

I'm not so sure about that choice, they could still pull a trigger on a gun.

**In Mo I Trust** · 11-01-08 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by fredgmuggs

I'm not so sure about that choice, they could still pull a trigger on a gun.

I assumed no weapons. Rhody?

**Toaderly** · 11-01-08 09:25 AM

Originally Posted by krystl

I thought of this immediately:

http://graphics.boston.com/images/bo..._flesh_5.3.jpg

So did I!

It's merely a flesh wound.

**RhodyYanksFan** · 11-01-08 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by In Mo I Trust

I assumed no weapons. Rhody?

Of course not. This needs to remain civilized.

**bobbymagee** · 11-01-08 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by In Mo I Trust

Legless, no mobility.

I've got to take up the fight for the legless fockers. They could easily get wheel chairs then all they need is ammo and gun, or bow and arrows to do damage. As for the armless freaks: I don't give a crap if they are kicking me because my bat will crush their skulls and/or bruise their legs , thighs or buttocks.

Go Legless fockers!!!!!!!!!!
Woooooooo

S2 · 11-01-08 09:33 AM

How long have they been this way? I remember seeing on Jerry Springer a guy who had no legs and he could move around just fine. If these guys just lost their legs it might be tougher for them to move but if they've been that way for a while then it's a different story. They'd be like giant spiders. I have nightmares about this stuff.

Give me the armless guys. If they have legs, what could they do? If they get close enough to kick, then I am close enough to throw some haymakers. It'd also take them longer to get up if knocked down.

**Yankeeah** · 11-01-08 09:34 AM

If they have no legs they would be like 2 feet tall, kind of hard to fight.

If they have no arms, it will be hard for them to solidly kick you, because they would just fall over.

With no arms, all they can really do is run away. With no legs all they can do is slap your shins.

I'll take no arms

S2 · 11-01-08 09:38 AM

Originally Posted by Yankeeah

If they have no legs they would be like 2 feet tall, kind of hard to fight.

Plus, it would give them a great oppurtunity to hit you where it really hurt. Repeatedly. Huge advantage for the legless.

**krystl** · 11-01-08 09:40 AM

Wait...I just re-read the question...You have to fight 5 people?
That changes everything.

**BillBuckner** · 11-01-08 09:47 AM

5 people with no legs. I'd just be sure to wear a cup.

**YASS** · 11-01-08 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by krystl

Wait...I just re-read the question...You have to fight 5 people?
That changes everything.

This is an important point. If you're fighting 5 at the same time, mobility is a much bigger advantage than the ability to make a punch.

I have a vision of 5 guys chasing me and trying to headbutt me into submission.

**YanksFan1992** · 11-01-08 10:11 AM

If they had no legs would they still get guns?

**Sam18** · 11-01-08 10:40 AM

No arms. They gotta use those legs to stand.

View Poll Results: Who would you fare better against?

Thread: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Thread Tools

Display

If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Re: If you had to fight 5 people, who would you have a better shot against?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions