there is no argument against that.
i do not limit the tools or means of evaluating a player's ability or contribution.
i use my eyes, traditional stats and advanced metrics.
TH: CC-48.....broke that.
HM: SC-14.....put 'em on the board.
I agree with you. I'm not saying metrics are worthless but I trust my eyes much more than an arbitrary spreadsheet formula someone came up with.
I'm gonna guess his frame. He looks wider than Stanton to me. Legs too. Probably has more bone denstity/and naturally bigger stronger bones too
Good news is Gardner had a BB in 4 PA.
That way his OBP doesn't fall below .318.
How low can his BA. go?