I've seen him rated as low as 60 and as high as 70, so 35-40 (like I said) is not out of the question.
It wasn't necessary because I wasn't in any way challenging the idea that you liked the trade. That was obvious from what you wrote. My question was to
I did, and I understand you support the deal. I guess I just don't understand why you think people are getting carried away with the statistical analysis?
However, in this case, they Yankees had doctors like Andrews, Kremchek and Altchek look at Tanaka and that was their recommendation.
Thanks for posting this. His high fastball in the 8th shows the potential of being a weapon. And his curves in the 7th and 8th looked sharp. Again,
Just noticed. Swift move on your part cutting out the part of my post where I lay out a strong defense of the trade.