Uh, no its not, and way to cherry pick what you chose to address from my reply to you. My full context of my reply to you was:
I really don't understand why Hal is so determined to get under the luxury threshold NOW. There's about a 1% chance that on December 2nd, 2016 it's still
No, it's not perfectly stated. Had it been perfectly stated, he would've included a caveat about getting a window to lock the guy up in order to gauge
Uh because that's a pretty good way to judge pitchers?
I never mentioned anything about trading our most valuable assets.
i also do not like huge trades for a single pitcher. you concentrate your risk way too much.
trade for a young positiion guy with that