Normally, I'd agree with you. But it just seems like we continually have project, after project, after project on this staff, none that have really benefited
I don't agree - you are still saving 30% and opening space for someone else. It's called moving forward.
Of course, finding the sucker
^ I understand why they'll fight like hell to protect a guaranteed salary...Just not for the reasons you've laid out.
I'm not buying that as a reason at all. If it were so precarious, the MLBPA would've fought the existing setup by now. There's a way to make it more fool-proof:
Looks like Ben Gamel is getting the call.
False positives are possible, there's no foolproof test setup. The scenario I described was extremely possible and would be a very bad one, which is one